Mercedes boss Toto Wolff says his team has “different objectives” to the FIA and Bernie Ecclestone with regards to new engine regulations.

– F1: Perez bracing for first ever home Grand Prix
– Matt Majendie: Hamilton officially an F1 other legends
– Alonso: F1 World Champion Hamilton already a great

The FIA announced on Monday it is pushing ahead with plans to introduce a cheaper “client engine” in 2017 in order to bring costs down for customer teams. The move is also designed to try and keep Red Bull in the sport as it threatens to quit F1 as a result of not having a competitive power unit. While Wolff understands why Ecclestone has been keen to make such a move, he is not in favour of the plan to introduce new engines.

“I think you have to understand the different perspectives in that situation,” Wolff said. “You have the engine manufactures who spend a considerable amount of money, who have decided to enter Formula One and stay in Formula One because their particular engine concept fits what is happening on the roads.

“But if you are looking at it from the commercial rights holder, the main priority is to have a level playing field and it’s not good that one concept is more successful than the other. It must always be an objective to level it out in some kind of way and it’s clear in that particular case that we have different objectives.”

And Wolff says Red Bull’s situation is a problem of its own making which he believes could be resolved by the team salvaging its partnership with Renault.

“First of all, I want to say that there is no team without an engine, one team decided to cancel the engine contract when they had one and that team can probably have the same engine again, although I’m not involved in those discussions, but there is no one without an engine.

“Introducing a new style of engine is complex because it needs to be balanced against the current system, we need to change the regulations and it is a completely different technological approach. Can it be done? Yes, it can be done but it’s not what we would be hoping for, but it’s because we have different objectives.”